Vulnerability Mapping of Aquifer Pollution of Bargain Using the COP and PaPRIKa Methods and Utilizing RS and GIS

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• mohammad ali zanganeh asadi
• nadia baghaee nejad
• shirin gholampur
• ali beheshti

Abstract

Carbonate aquifer water resources are important on a global scale. Vulnerability assessment and hazard zonation mapping approach is important in the management of such resources. In the presence of a thin layer of soil above epithelial Karstic aquifers, the polluted recharge water, which is not a devotedly filleted, enters and contaminates the ground wafer. The purpose of this study is to provide an aquifer vulnerability map of the Baqi Neishabour Karstic aquifer using the COP and PaPRIKa models and management approaches to preserve these resources. In Software GIS, parameters on both the set and then combine’s vulnerability maps were obtained for both methods. According to the results of PaPRIKa region in terms of the vulnerability of the three classes is very high, high and medium zoning that respectively 8.9 percent, 63.8 percent and 27.2 percent were taken to area. The results showed that COP index for the study area between 0.5 to 12 variables. So the range in terms of vulnerability to four different categories of zoning, which include: the vulnerability of high, medium, low and very low, respectively 9.8 percent, 50 percent, 25.6 percent and 14.6 percent of the total area in the region.

Keywords

• Vulnerability
• Baqi Basin
• Karst
• COP method
• Paprika method

20.1001.1.20086377.1394.8.25.8.6

---

References

1. افروزی، م، ح. محمدزاده .1392. ارزیابی آسیب پذیری دشت بروجن- فرادنبه با استفاده از شبیه DRASTIC براساس نیترات. مجله پژوهش آب ایران.7 :218-213
2. باقرزاده، س، ن، کلانتری، م، مراد زاده، م، رحیمی، م، فاضلی، م. کشاورزیی. 1389. استفاده از تکنیکهای GIS و سنجش از دور به روش COP مطالعه موردی آبخوان کارستی شیمبا. همایش ملی ژئوماتیک، تهران.
3. پیری، ح، بامری، ابوالفضل. 1393. بزاورد نسبت جذبی سدیم (SAR) در آبهای زیر زمینی با استفاده از وایازی خطی چند متغیزه شبکه ی عصبی مصنوعی (مطالعه­ی موردی دشت بجستان). مجله مهندسی منابع آب.73: 80-67
4. عباسی، م، ا. محمدی. 1392.تهیه نقشه آسیب پذیری آلودگی آبخوان کارستی مانشت با استفاده از شبیه ریسک. پژوهش های زمین ریخت شناسی کمی. 2 : 168-155
5. قربانی، م، م. اونق.1391.  پهنه بندی تحول و حساسیت کارست با استفاده از شبیه رگرسیون خطّی چند متغیره در منطقه ی کارستی شاهو. پژوهش های زمین ریخت شناسی کمی، 1 :32-19 .
6. مظفری زاده، ج، ز. سجادی. 1391. بررسی علل شوری و نفوذ آب شور رودهای دالکی و حله به آبخوان برازجان. مجلهی مهندسی منابع آب .6
   1392 :69 -78
   1. Afrasiabian, A. 2007. The Importance of    protection and management of karst wateras drinking water resources in Iran. Environ. Geol. 52:673-677.
   2. Andreo, B., N., Ravbar, and J.M. Vias .2009. Source vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karst) aquifers by extension of the COP method: Application to pilot sites. Hydrogeol. J. 17:749–758
   3. Bakalowicz, M .1995. La zoned’infiltration des aquifères karstiques: methods d’étude structure ET fonctionnement, infiltration zones in karst aquifers: methods of study structure and functioning. Hydrogéologie. 4:3–21
   4. De Jong, C., S., Cappy, and D. Funk,  2008 Transdisciplinary analysis of water problems in the mountainous karst areas of Morocco. Eng. Geol.99: 228-238
   5. Ford, D.C. And P.W. Williams, 2007 .Karst geomorphology and hydrology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
   6. oldscheider, N. 2005. Karst groundwater vulnerability mapping: Application of a new method in the Swabia Alba, Germany.Hydrogeol J 13:555–564.
   7. Hartmann, M. T. Weiler, J. Wagener, M, Lange, F. Kralik, N. Humer, A. Mizyed, J. A. Rimmer, B. Barber´a, C. Andreo, A. Butscher, and P. Hugge­nberger. 2013. Process-based karst modelling to relate hydrodynamic and hydrochemical  characteristics to system properties., Hydrol Earth Syst.  Sci.10: 2835-2878.
   8. Kavouri, K., V., Plagnes, J, Tremoulet, N., Dorfliger, F., Rejiba, P. Marchet, 2011. “Paprika: A method For estimating karst resource and Source vulnerability–application to the Ouysse karst syster. (Southwest France)”,Hydrogeol.J.19: 339-353
   9. Konstantin’s. Ch., P., Valérie G, Roger and P. Rémi Frank 2011. Bosch, contribution of geophysical methods to Karst-system exploration: An overview. Hydrogeol. J. 19:  1169–1180.
   10. Krishnamurthy. J., and G. Srinivas, 1995. Role of geological and geomorphological factors in ground water exploration. A study using IRS LISS data.Int J Remote Sens.16: 2595-2618.
   11. Mangin, A. 1975. Contribution à l’étude hydrodynamique des aquifers karstiques [Contribution to the hydrodynamic study of karst aquifers]. PhD Thesis, Université de Dijon, France, 298
   12. Marin, AI., N. Dorfliger. and B., Andreo,. 2012. Comparative application of two method (COP and PaPRIKa) for groundwater vulnerability mapping in Mediterranean karst aquifers (France and Spain) Environ. Earth. Sci. 65: 2407- 2421.
   13. Massomisamakosh, j, .Bagheri, S. Davoodi, M. Yarahmadi, D, Jafari, Aghadamand., and Soltani, M. 2013. assessing and mapping the vulnerability of karstic aquifer using GIS and COP model, Glob Nest  J. 15:384-393
   14. Vı´as. J.M, B., Andreo. MJ. Perles F.,  Carrasco I., Vadillo. P, Jime´nez. 2004. The COP method. In: F, Zwahlen (ed). Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers, EUR 20912. Brussels7 European Commission, Directorate-General XII Sci. Res. and Dev. t: 71- 163
   15. White, WB .2007. A brief history of karst hydrogeology: Contributions of the NSS. J. Cave Karst Stud. 69:13–26
   16. Zwahlen, F .2004. COST Action 620: Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karst) aquifers. Final Report, Europ. Water Fram. Dir. EC, Brussels.