Mapping Water Salinity and Sodicity Using Selected Geostatistical Methods, Case Study: Kerman Plain

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• M. Delbari
• P. Afrasiab
• M. Salari

Abstract

Proper design and management of irrigation systems requires knowledge of soil infiltration rate, which is in turn influenced by water salinity and sodicity. The objectives of this study were to investigate the spatial variability of irrigation water electrical conductivity (EC) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and to map these parameters using geostatistical methods. The main objective was to predict the spatial distribution pattern of soil infiltration rate over the study area based on water salinity and sodicity. Water samples were collected from 76 observations wells in the Kerman Plain in 2008. The geostatistical methods used were ordinary and log-normal kriging. The performance of interpolation methods was evaluated through cross-validation with comparison criteria of root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Geostatistical analysis showed that both EC and SAR had strong spatial correlations, and these fitted a spherical model. The cross-validation results are indicated that the two methods provided similar accuracy for estimating salinity and sodicity. Furthermore, it was evident from the kriged maps generated through both methods for EC and SAR that the estimation error maps produced were only slightly different. Therefore, whenever the aim is to produce only a map of spatial distribution of soil properties, ordinary kriging, which is mathematically simpler than other methods, is preferred. Soil infiltration rate distribution pattern was also predicted based on the kriged maps of EC and SAR, and, some approved standards. The results indicated that most of that area, including northern and western regions had good infiltration rates. The rest, which cover mostly the northeastern and southeastern of the study area, had moderate infiltration rates.

Keywords

• Geostatistics
• ordinary Kriging
• lognormal kriging
• Electrical Conductivity
• sodium absorption ratio
• Infiltration

20.1001.1.20086377.1392.6.16.2.8

---

References

1. 1 .امداد، م. ر.، ح. فرداد، و ح. سیادت. 1382 .تأثیر کیفیـت-

   های مختلف آب آبیاری (شوری و سدیمی) بر نفوذپـذیری

   نهایی خاک در آبیاری جویچهای علـوم خـاک و آب، 17 ::

    .239-232

   2. Adhikary, P.P., H. Chandrasekharan, D.

   Chakraborty, and K. Kamble. 2009.

   Assessment of groundwater pollution in

   West Delhi, India using geostatistical

   approach. Environ. Monit Assess. DOI

   10.1007/s10661-009-1076-5.

   3. Agassi, M., I. Shainberg, and J. Morin.
   4. Effect of electrolyte concentration

   and soil sodicity on infiltration rate and

   crust formation. Soil Sc. Soc. Am. J. 48:

   848-851.

   4. Ayers, R.S., and K. Tanji. 1981. An

   application from Ayers and Westcot's 1985

   "Use of treated municipal wastewaters for

   irrigation." FAO Irrigation and Drainage

   Paper No. 29 Rev. 1. Originally published

   as an ASCE 1981 Water Forum

   Conference Proceedings.

   5. Ayers, R.S., and D.W. Westcot. 1989.

   Water quality for agriculture. FAO

   Irrigation and Drainage. Paper No: 29, pp.

   1–174. Rome.

   6. Bauder, J.W., and T.A. Brock. 2001.

   Irrigation water quality, soil amendment,

   and crop effects on sodium leaching. Arid

   Land Res. and Manage. 15: 101-113.

   7. Beltran, J.M. 1999. Irrigation with saline

   water: benefits and environmental impact.

   Agric. Wat. Manage.40:183-194.

   8. Bishop, T.F.A., and A.B. McBratney.
   9. A comparison of prediction methods

   for the creation of field-extent soil property

   maps. Geoderma 103: 149–160.

   9. Burgess, T.M., and R. Webster. 1980.

   Optimal interpolation and isarithmic

   mapping of soil properties: I. The

   variogram and punctual kriging. J. Soil

   Sci. 31: 315–331.

   10. Cambardella, C.A., T.B. Moorman, J.M.

   Novak, T.B. Parkin, D.L. Karlen, R.F.

   Turco, and A.E. Konopka. 1994. Fieldscale variability of soil properties in central

   Iowa soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 1501–

   1511.

   11. Delbari, M. 2007. Estimation and

   stochastic simulation of soil properties for

   case studies in Lower Austria and Sistan

   plain, southeast of Iran. Doctorate thesis.

   University of Natural Resources and

   Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

   12. Falstad, J. 2000. Soil Condition.

   Transplant status in Burger Draw. Billings

   Gazette. Prepared by D.G. Steward Page.

   Burger Draw Comments and

   Recommendations. 6/06/00.

   13. García-Soldado, M.J., M. Chica-Olmo,

   J.A. Luque-Espinar, and V. RodríguezGaliano. 2008. A geostatistical approach to

   water quality spatial analysis at municipal

   level. Int. geo. Congr. Oslo, August, 6-14th

   .

   14. Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for

   natural resources evaluation. Oxford

   University Press, New York. 483 p.

   15. Goovaerts, P. 1998. Geostatistical tools for

   characterizing the spatial variability of

   microbiological and physico-chemical soil

   properties. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 27: 315-334.

   16. Hadas, A., and H, Frenkel. 1982.

   Infiltration as affected by long-term use of

   sodic-saline water for irrigation.Soil Sci.

   Soc. Am. J. 46: 524-530.

   17. Hanson, B., S.R. Grattan, and A. Fulton.
   18. Agricultural salinity and drainage.

   University of California Irrigation

   Program. University of California, Davis.

   18. Hu, K., Y. Huang, H. Li, B. Li, D. Chen,

   and R.E. White. 2005. Spatial variability of

   shallow groundwater level, electrical

   conductivity and nitrate concentration, and

   risk assessment of nitrate contamination in

   North China Plain. Env. Int. 6: 896-903.

   19. Isaaks, E.H., and R.M. Srivastava. 1989.

   An introduction to applied geostatistics.

   Oxford University Press. New York. 561

   p.

   20. Istok, J.D., J.D. Smyth, and A.L Flint.
   21. Multivariate geostatistical analysis

   of groundwater contamination: a case

   history. Groundwater. 31: 63-74.

   21. Journel, A.G., and C.J. Huijbregts. 1978.

   Mining geostatistics. Academic Press. New

   York. 600 p.

   22. Mailhol, J.C., M. Priol, and M. Benali.
   23. A furrow irrigation model to

   improve irrigation practices in the Gharb

   مجلهی مهندسی منابع آب / سال ششم / بهار 1392) صص24 -11 (23

   Valley of Morocco. Agric. Wat. Manage.

   42(1): 65-80.

   23. Miller, R.W., and R.L. Donahue. 1995.

   Soils in our Environment. Seventh Edition.

   Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 323

   p.

   24. Oster, J.D., and W. Schroer. 1979.

   Infiltration as influenced by irrigation

   water quality. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43:

   444-447.

   25. Patriarche, D., M.C. Castro, and P.

   Goovaerts. 2005. Estimating regional

   hydraulic conductivity fields—A

   comparative study of geostatistical

   methods. Math. Geol.37: 587–613.

   26. Robertson, G.P. 2000. GS+: Geostatistics

   for the environment sciences. GS+ User´s

   Guide Version 5: Plainwell, Gamma

   design software. 200 p

   27. Rouhani, S., and T.J. Hall. 1988.

   Geostatistical schemes for groundwater

   sampling. J. Hydrol. 103: 85-102.

   28. Saito, H., and P. Goovaerts. 2000.

   Geostatistical interpolation of positively

   skewed and censored data in a dioxincontaminated site. Environ. Sci. Technol.

   34: 4228–4235.

   29. Shainberg, I., and J. Letey. 1984. Response

   of soils to sodic and saline conditions.

   Hilgardia 61: 21-57.

   30. Slavich, P.G., G.H. Petterson, and D.

   Griffin. 2002. Effects of irrigation water

   salinity and sodicity on infiltration and

   lucerne growth over a shallow water table.

   Aus. J. of Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 42:

   379-387.

   31. Söderström, M. 1992. Geostatistical

   modeling of salinity as a basis for

   irrigation management and crop

   selection—A case study in central Tunisia.

   Environ. Geol.20: 85-92.

   32. Taghizadeh Mehrjardi, R., M. Zareian

   Jahromi, Sh. Mahmodi and, A. Heidari.

   2008. Spatial distribution of groundwater

   quality with geostatistics (Case Study:

   Yazd-Ardakan Plain). World Appl. Sci. J.

   4: 9-17.

   33. Triantafilis, J., I.O.A. Odeh, and A.B.

   McBratney. 2001. Five geostatistical

   models to predict soil salinity from

   electromagnetic induction data across

   irrigated cotton. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:

   869–878.

   34. Van de Graaff, R, and R.A. Patterson.
   35. Explaining the mysteries of salinity,

   sodicity, SAR and ESP in on-site practice

   p.p.361-368.

   35. Patterson, R.A., and M.J. Jones (Eds). In

   Proceedings of On-site ’01 Conf:

   Advancing On-site Wastewater Systems

   Published by Lanfax Laboratories,

   Armidale ISBN 0-9579438-0-6.

   36. Warrence, Nikos, J., E. Pearson, James.

   Krista and W. Bauder. 2003. The basics of

   salinity and sodicity effects on soil

   physical properties [Online]. Available at

   http://waterquality. montana.

   edu/docs/methane.

   37. Zirschky, J., G.P. Keary, R.O. Gilbert, and

   E.J. Middlebrocks. 1985. Spatial

   estimation of hazardous waste site data. J.

   Environ. Eng. Div. ASCE, 111: 777-789.