Application of transformed data in rain gauge network design using entropy concept

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Islamic Azad University, Shiraz Branch - Faculty memeber

Abstract

Precipitation is known as one of the most important factors in a hydrologic cycle. Hence, an accurate knowledge of rainfall data, which are usually gathered through a group of rain gauges, is necessary for any hydrologic simulation on a watershed. Therefore, a rain gauge network design, including determination of an optimum number of stations, is one of the fundamental concerns in any hydrologic study. Several indexes are employed to express accuracy of a rain gauge network. Among the indexes, entropy is one of the well-used concepts, which is utilized to assess the accuracy of the data collected by any rain gauge network. In earlier studies, entropy-based equations were used assuming normality of rainfall data. This assumption may have led to inaccuracy in results. In this study, the validation of the supposition was checked by the actually observed (non-normal) monthly precipitation data of 24 rain gauges in the Province of Fars, Iran. A traditional rain gauge network design based on the entropy concept and the actually observed data was used. The designed network compared with a procedure in which the Box-Cox transformation is used to normalize primary data. The results indicate that the priority of selected stations changes drastically, and entropy growth rate decreases, as the number of the rain gauge stations whose transformed data are used increased.

Keywords

References

1)       Alfonso L., Lobbrecht A., and Price R. 2010. Information theory–based approach for location of monitoring water level gauges in polders. Water Resour. Res. (46):  W03528
2)       Al-Zahrani M., and Husain T. 1998. An algorithm for designing a precipitation network in the south-western region of Saudi Arabia. J. Hydrol. 205: 205-216,
3)       Box G.E.P., and Cox D.R. 1964. An analysis transformation. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B26: 211-252
4)       Chen Y.C., Wei C, and Yeh H.C. 2008. Rainfall network design using Kriging and entropy. Hydrol. Process. 22: 340-346
5)       Cheng K.C., Lin Y.C., and Liou J.J. 2008. Rain-gauge network evaluation and augmentation using geostatistics. Hydrol. Process. 22(14): 2554-2564
6)       Harmancioglu N., and Yevjevich V. 1987. Transfer of hydrologic information among river points. J. Hydrol. 91: 103-118
7)       Husain T. 1987 .Hydrologic Network Design Formulation. Canadian Water Resources Journal. 12(1): 44-63
8)       Husain T. 1989. Hydrologic uncertainty measure and network design. Water Resour. Bull., 25(3): 527-534
9)       Krstonavic (1) P.F. 1992 Evaluation of rainfall network using entropy: I. theoretical development. Water Resour. Manag. 6: 279-293
10)   Krstonavic (2) P.F. 1992. Evaluation of rainfall network using entropy: II. Application. Water Resour. Manag. 6: 295-314
11)   Machiwal D., and Jha M.K. 1012. Hydrologic time series analysis. Capital Publishing Company: pp 272
12)   Mazzarella A., and Tranfaglia G. 2000. Fractal characterization of geophysical measuring networks and its implication for an optimal location of additional stations: an application to a rain-gauge network, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 65: 157-163
13)   Memarzadeh M., Mahjouri N., and Kerachian R. 2013. Evaluating sampling locations in river water quality monitoring networks: application of dynamic factor analysis and discrete entropy theory.  Environ. Earth Sci. 70: 2577-2585
14)   Shaghaghian M.R., and Abedini M.J. 2013. Rain gauge network design using coupled geostatistical and multivariate techniques. Scientia Iranica A. 20(2): 259-269
15)   Shannon C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27: 623-656
16)   Wei C., Yeh H.C., and Chen Y.C. 2014. Spatiotemporal scaling effect on rainfall network design using entropy. Entropy. 16(8): 4626-4647
Yeh H.C., Chen Y.C., Wei C., Chen R.H. 2011. Entropy and Kriging Approach to rainfall Network Design. Paddy Water Environ. 9: 343-355

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 02 May 2016
  • Revise Date: 03 August 2016
  • Accept Date: 28 October 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics